10:02
The Chair asks whether the Committee is attempting to establish whether Ozols existed, whether particular texts are by Ozols, or whether it matters.
10:11
Professor N. proposes beginning with the handwriting. Dr V. observes that none of the documents are in the same handwriting.
10:19
The Committee agrees this is consistent with a writer known to use pseudonyms.
10:26
Dr V. observes that it is equally consistent with several people.
10:31
The Committee agrees not to record this point as it may be misinterpreted.
10:44
Mensonge submits a 46-page note on the spelling Ozols/Ozuls. The Chair rules the note out of scope.
10:45
Mensonge appeals the ruling.
10:46
[REMAINDER CLASSIFIED BY JANUS-3: predicted reputational harm 0.81]