Position A: Ozols
Supported by Latvian orthography, university records reproduced in Baldois, and common sense.
Position B: Ozuls
Appears in several English translations, two Polish magazines and the Centre’s own early catalogue.
Position C: Both
Advocated by editors who wish to finish their work.
Position D: Neither
A minority position among scholars who believe the author did not exist.
Mensonge’s ruling
Use Ozols when referring to the historian, Ozuls when referring to the fictional author, unless the source does the opposite, in which case preserve the error and add a note.
Addendum
This ruling has created more inconsistencies than it resolved.